POSTSCRIPT
The author of short stories often stamps his work with his own special
brand of endings -- they then become his stories and no one else's.
Endings could be happy ones which give the reader a good feeling or they
could be either tragic, ironic or cynical leaving the reader sad,
surprised or even angry. A provocative ending, however, stimulates a
reader to think, argue and disagree, and perhaps, inspires the reader to
come up with his or her own version of an ending -- the new version of
the story is then no longer the sole property of the author but the
product of a partnership between the writer and the reader.
Possible Alternative Endings
In 'The Chicken Hawk' we could have spared the five chicks
and joining the story at the point when the roosters and hens were gathered for a
conference ended it this way:
One of the hens suggested, "Let's not take any chances and peck them to
death." But the roosters disagreed saying, "If the farmer finds dead
chicks in the yard he will think we are going around murdering chicks at
will. It would be better if we left them alone and let them starve
themselves to death."
After the conference the hens passed the word around to all the chicks
that the five peculiar chicks were to be strictly left to themselves.
Without help the five chicks wandered around aimlessly with no one to
turn to. Out of exhaustion and near starvation one of the chicks
collapsed and the other four gathered around and, with their beaks
turned downwards tried to help it to get on its feet. While they were
doing this, one of them noticed grains and found them quite good to eat.
At last, they had learnt to turn their heads down and peck at grains!
Soon they were accepted, although not quite as equals, by the rest.
The old hawk who hovered above the farm each day saw all this and flew
home to his nest with a quiet joy in his heart.
'The Two Sparrows' could have ended on a more positive note:
One day while he was being fed, the elder sparrow noticed his blind
brother fidgeting with a few twigs, knitting them together with his beak
and claws. This gave him an idea. The next day he brought home more
twigs and in a few days his brother showed him a little latticed mat
which he had knitted. He put it at the bottom of the nest. It was
comfortable to sit on, but more important, it allowed rain water to
drain off easily, leaving the nest less moist after a storm.
The elder sparrow then brought home more and more twigs and each time a
mat was completed he would fly off with it and exchange it with the
birds for food. He explained to his brother that he was trading his
handicraft for food. The blind sparrow was overjoyed and declared,
"Brother, we are now partners."
In 'The Bugs who Lived in a Cinema' we could have got rid of the
self-sacrificing rat -- he was quite an unbelievable character anyway --
and let him slip off the seat in anger, realising what was going on but
nevertheless just ran off. However......
The bugs in the seat next to the empty one saw what happened and decided
on a compromise. The oldest bug went to the head of the bridge between
the seats and shouted across, "I tell you what -- we will allow your
youngest bugs to come over to our seat provided that you will allow us
to send over some of our strongest young bugs." There was no alternative
but for the hungry bugs to agree to their offer.
After a few days the rat passed the seat again and thought with
satisfaction that all was back to normal and all seemed happy and
peaceful again.
Little did he know that in fact one family of bugs now virtually owned
two seats.
The poor washing-machine in
'The Obsolescent Washing Machine' could have
been given back some self-respect if we ended the story from the point
when it was put up for sale as a second-hand model, this way:
One day a young couple, probably newly-weds, came into the store and
while the young husband was most enthusiastic about the newest models
explaining in great detail all the new technology that was included in
them, his wife quietly looked around the store. When she came upon the
old washing-machine she called out to her husband, "I want this one!" He
replied, "It's second hand and it hasn't got the conveniences of the new
ones. Don't worry about the money. I think we can afford the latest
model."
"It's not the money," she said, "it's just that whatever you may have to
say about the new model, I still believe in the old saying, 'they don't
make them as well as they used to.' I definitely want this."
I have already indicated how I had originally ended the creeper story
but it may be of interest to note the reaction of one young man who
thought the old man was very foolish to chop down the first creeper.
"After all," he said, "so what if the old oak loses all its leaves. The
creeper is young and will take over and will probably provide the old
man with even better protection. Of course, the old man could still
plant his second seed if he wished."
We could be less cruel to
'The Tree who Wanted to be a Ship'. We could
spare him of being doomed to be burnt but let him become a part of a
stool or a chair and even let him end up as a piece of furniture on the
same ship where his trunk was the main mast.
Most young people could not accept the apparent paradox 'freedom in
enchainment' and demanded that
'The In-Between Puppy' be given back some
freedom, when he grew old enough to look after himself, to wander about
freely and if he wished visit the old man regularly.
I hope that these ideas will inspire readers to write their own endings
to these stories and will deeply appreciate it if some will be kind
enough to send me, through the publisher, their version of the ending to
one or more of these stories.
If these stories are used in the classroom, students could be asked not
only to offer alternative endings but to rewrite the whole or part of
the stories adding descriptive phrases giving them colour and 'body'.
Similarly, younger students could be asked to shade or colour the
skeleton illustrations. With more mature students, these stories could
be used as material for discussions.
SUGGESTED TOPICS FOR DISCUSSIONS
- A paternalistic government tends to produce an over-protected people
inadequately prepared to stand on its own feet.
- Charity can inadvertently deprive the recipient of self-respect and renders him
continually reliant on aid.
- Man is not born really equal and should not be deceived by allowing them to
imagine they are equal.
- An accelerated educational programme can produce ill-prepared individuals
who tend to be anti-establishment.
- In a rapidly developing society, there is a tendency for young people to be
over-ambitious leading to discontentment.
- Over-specialised technical training could produce
uneducated people not equipped to adapt to changes.
- Personal freedom exercised within the bounds dictated by culture, family, state and
church leads to a harmonious society, while independent individual
freedom can lead to anarchism.
In these postscript, I am merely trying to suggest ideas on how these
stories may be used in the classroom. Eventually, it must be the teacher
who must decide on how they should be used.
|